The Canis Lupus Dingo is a fascinating creature with a rich history. It's believed to have originated from a domesticated dog that was introduced to Australia by Asian sailors around 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
The exact timing of the Dingo's arrival in Australia is still debated among scientists. However, most agree that the Dingo's ancestors were likely brought to the continent by humans.
As the Dingo adapted to its new environment, it began to change and evolve into the unique species we see today. This process of adaptation was likely influenced by the Dingo's diet and the geographic isolation of the Australian continent.
Taxonomy and Classification
Taxonomy and Classification is a complex and debated topic among zoologists. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) advises on the correct use of scientific names of animals.
The ICZN has entered Canis familiaris and Canis dingo into its official list, making them available for use as correct names for the taxa in question. According to the Principle of Coordination, the same epithets can also be applied at subspecies level.
In 2005, W. Christopher Wozencraft listed the dingo as a subspecies of Canis lupus, but this classification is debated among zoologists. Some argue that the dingo should be considered a distinct taxon, Canis dingo Meyer 1793, due to its distinct behavior, morphology, and genetic characteristics.
Here is a list of taxonomic synonyms for Canis lupus dingo:
- Canis dingo Meyer, 1793: 33 (protonym) [available name, validated by ICZN, Opinion 451, 1957]
- Canis familiaris dingo: Blumenbach, 1799 [changed rank]
- Canis lupus dingo: Wilson & Reeder, Mammal Species of the World (3rd edition), 1995: 576 (and possibly earlier sources) [subspecies allocated to different parent]
Taxonavigation
Taxonavigation is the process of classifying living organisms into a hierarchy of ranks. This is done by assigning a specific taxonomic rank to each species, such as kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. The taxonavigation of the dingo, Canis lupus dingo, starts at the highest rank, Eukaryota, and works its way down to the species level.
The dingo belongs to the kingdom Animalia, and more specifically, to the phylum Chordata, which includes animals with a notochord, a dorsal nerve cord, and a post-anal tail. The dingo's taxonavigation also includes the class Mammalia, order Carnivora, family Canidae, and genus Canis.
Here is a breakdown of the dingo's taxonavigation:
- Superregnum: Eukaryota
- Regnum: Animalia
- Subregnum: Eumetazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
- Megaclassis: Osteichthyes
- Classis: Mammalia
- Subclassis: Trechnotheria
- Infraclassis: Zatheria
- Supercohors: Theria
- Cohors: Eutheria
- Infraclassis: Placentalia
- Superordo: Laurasiatheria
- Grandordo: Ferungulata
- Mirordo: Ferae
- Cladus: Pancarnivora
- Cladus: Carnivoramorpha
- Cladus: Carnivoraformes
- Ordo: Carnivora
- Subordo: Caniformia
- Familia: Canidae
- Subfamilia: Caninae
- Tribus: Canini
- Genus: Canis
- Species: Canis lupus
- Subspecies: Canis lupus dingo
Combinations
Taxonomy and Classification can get pretty complex, but let's break it down. The classification of Canis dingo, a type of wild dog, has undergone significant changes over the years.
The first recorded name for Canis dingo was Canis dingo Meyer, 1793, which was later validated by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN).
The name Canis familiaris dingo was proposed by Blumenbach in 1799, but it was a change in rank rather than a new species.
In 1995, Wilson and Reeder allocated Canis dingo as a subspecies of Canis lupus in their book Mammal Species of the World (3rd edition), page 576.
Here are the different combinations of names used to classify Canis dingo:
- Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
- Canis familiaris dingo Blumenbach, 1799
- Canis lupus dingo Wilson & Reeder, 1995
Taxonomic Debate
Taxonomic debate is a lively topic among zoologists, and it's fascinating to explore the different perspectives on the classification of the dingo. Mathew Crowther, Stephen Jackson, and Colin Groves disagree with Wozencraft's classification, arguing that the dingo should be considered a distinct taxon, Canis dingo Meyer 1793.
The ICZN Opinion 2027 plays a significant role in this debate, as it states that a domestic animal cannot be a subspecies. Crowther and others argue that the dingo's differences in behavior, morphology, and genetics justify its classification as a distinct taxon. They point out that the dingo and dog do not fall within the same clade as the wolf.
The taxonomic synonyms for the dingo are numerous, with some considering it a subspecies of the wolf, Canis lupus, while others regard it as a distinct species or subspecies of the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. The list of synonyms is quite extensive:
- Canis antarticus (sic) Kerr, 1792 [suppressed by ICZN, Opinion 451, 1957]
- Canis australiae Gray, 1826
- Canis dingoides Matschie, 1915
- Canis macdonnellensis Matschie, 1915
- Canis papuensis Ramsay, 1879
- Canis tenggerana Kohlbrugge, 1896
- Canis hallstromi Troughton, 1957
- Canis familiaris australasiae Desmarest, 1820
- Canis familiaris novaehollandiae Voigt, 1831
- Canis tanggerana harappensis Prashad, 1936
The ICZN has entered the names Canis familiaris and Canis dingo into its official list, making them available for use as correct names for the taxa in question. However, taxonomists continue to debate the classification of the dingo, with some considering it a subspecies of the wolf and others regarding it as a distinct species or subspecies of the domestic dog.
Lineage
The lineage of the dingo is a fascinating topic. Dingoes are descended from a small founding population that arrived in Australia between 12,000 and 3,500 years ago.
Studies of mtDNA indicate that dingoes are descended from a single founding event or no more than a few founding events, with estimates ranging from 5,400–4,600 years ago to 18,300–4,640 years ago.
The dingo's lineage is closely tied to that of domestic dogs, with whole genome sequencing indicating that there was ancient inbreeding in the founding population that first arrived in Australia less than 4,000 years ago.
Genetic evidence suggests that dingoes cluster with the same clade as about 71% of dog breeds and wolves do, indicating a close relationship between the two.
Here are some key dates in the dingo's lineage:
- 12,000-3,500 years ago: Dingoes arrive in Australia
- 5,400-4,600 years ago: Dingoes undergo a single founding event or no more than a few founding events
- 4,000 years ago: Ancient inbreeding occurs in the founding population
The dingo's unique genetic makeup is a result of its isolation from other dogs until the arrival of Europeans, making it a fascinating subject for study in the field of taxonomy and classification.
Genetic Evidence
The genetic evidence suggests that dingoes share a common ancestry with domestic dogs and wolves. This is supported by the sequencing of ancient dog genomes, which indicates that dingoes descended from an ancient, now-extinct wolf population.
Genetic studies have shown that dingoes cluster with the same clade as 71% of dog breeds and wolves. This is likely due to the fact that a very early or very primitive canid will share wolf-like traits.
Mitochondrial genome sequences indicate that dingoes have very few maternal haplotypes, with only two haplotypes (A29 and A79) being found in a sample of 211 dingoes. These haplotypes differ by only one substitution in the control region, suggesting a single founding event.
However, a more recent study found 20 different maternal haplotypes in a sample of 25 dingoes, suggesting a larger founding population and possibly more than one founding event.
Paternal haplotypes on the Y chromosome in dingoes are few, with only two haplotypes (H3 and H60) being found. These haplotypes are shared with other dog breeds, suggesting that dingoes are feralized descendants of southeast Asian dogs.
Take a look at this: Domestic Dingo Dog
Some dog breeds, including the dingo and the Basenji, are almost as genetically divergent from other dogs as the dog is from the wolf. This distinctiveness could be reflecting geographic isolation from the admixture that later occurred in other dogs in their regions.
The dingo's genome contains 2% gene flow from the Tibetan wolf, which likely represents ancient admixture in eastern Eurasia.
Related reading: Australian Cattle Dog Dingo
Dingo Origins and History
The dingo's origins and history are a fascinating topic. In 1623, Jan Carstenszoon was the first European to sight Australian Aborigines with canids, later followed by William Dampier in 1699.
The name Canis dingo was first proposed by Friedrich Meyer in 1793, ratified by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature in 1957. Meyer's paper was based on a painting of a dingo and a brief description by Governor Arthur Phillip, rather than first-hand observations.
A painting of a dingo, completed in 1772, was commissioned by Joseph Banks and based on his observations during the Cook voyage. The painting was one of several produced by George Stubbs.
Origins
The first recorded sighting of Australian Aborigines with canids was in 1623 by Jan Carstenszoon, but it wasn't until 1699 that William Dampier made similar observations.
The name Canis dingo was proposed by Friedrich Meyer in 1793, but it was based on Governor Arthur Phillip's brief description and a painting, rather than first-hand observations of the animal.
In 1768, James Cook led a scientific voyage to New Holland, which is now Australia, and collected specimens for further study.
The first Fleet arrived in Botany Bay in 1788, under the command of Australia's first colonial governor, Arthur Phillip, who took ownership of a dingo and made a brief description with an illustration.
Friedrich Meyer classified the "Dog of New South Wales" as Canis dingo in 1793, based on Phillip's description and illustration.
However, it was discovered in 1947 that Meyer's name had been predated by another taxon, Canis antarticus Kerr, 1792, which had priority over Meyer's name.
The International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) suppressed the epithet antarticus in 1957, in favor of dingo Meyer 1793.
Papua New Guinea
In Papua New Guinea, you can find a unique canine species known as the Papuan dog, which was originally described as Canis familiaris var. papuensis by Ramsay in 1879.
These dogs are smaller than dingos, don't have the characteristic bushy tail, and have relatively smaller brain parts compared to the dingo.
They are often timid and howl rather than bark, a distinct trait that sets them apart from other dogs.
In some villages, Papuan dogs are fed by their owners, but they also have a knack for foraging for food, hunting for crabs and small fish on reefs at low tide.
At night, they help clean up refuse left in the village, often alongside pigs.
Rarely do Papuan dogs go hunting with their owners, but this species has sparked interest in its origins, with some proposing that Canis papuensis may simply refer to feral dogs.
Related reading: Toxocara Canis in Dogs
Dingo Characteristics and Attributes
The dingo is a fascinating creature, and let's start with its name. The taxon Canis dingo, or Canis lupus dingo, or Canis familiaris dingo, or simply included within Canis familiaris without further differentiation, according to different authorities.
For your interest: Domestic Dog Scientific Name
The dingo's name has a rich history, and it's interesting to note that it was first classified by Friedrich Meyer in 1793 as Canis dingo, based on Arthur Phillip's brief description and illustration of the "Dog of New South Wales".
The dingo's taxonomic synonyms include Canis familiaris australasiae, Canis australiae, Canis dingoides, Canis macdonnellensis, and Canis familiaris novaehollandiae, which were all regarded as its taxonomic synonyms located in Australia.
James Cook's voyage of discovery to Australia in 1768 marked the beginning of the dingo's history in scientific records. His ship, the HMS Endeavour, arrived in Botany Bay in 1770, and the mission made notes and collected specimens for taking back to Britain.
The dingo's classification has undergone changes over the years, and in 1947, it was discovered that Meyer's taxon Canis dingo had been named already, as the "New Holland dog" Canis antarticus [sic] Kerr, 1792.
Worth a look: An Australian Dingo Dog
Conclusion
The Canis lupus dingo is a unique and fascinating species. They are a distinct population of the grey wolf that has been isolated in Australia for thousands of years.
Their adaptability to the Australian environment is a testament to their resilience and ability to thrive in harsh conditions. They have been able to survive without a significant reduction in their population.
Their diet consists mainly of small to medium-sized prey, which they hunt in packs. This social behavior allows them to hunt more efficiently and increase their chances of survival.
Their ability to coexist with humans has been a subject of interest, with some dingoes being kept as pets and others living in the wild. However, it's essential to remember that dingoes are wild animals and should be treated with caution and respect.
Their unique genetic makeup has made them an important subject of study in the field of genetics and conservation biology.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a dingo breed with a dog?
Yes, dingos can interbreed with domestic dogs, resulting in hybrids or crossbreds. This process has been occurring since European settlement in Australia.
Is a dingo a wolf or coyote?
Dingos are not wolves or coyotes, but rather an intermediate species between wolves and domestic dogs, according to recent DNA sequencing. Their unique genetic makeup sets them apart from both wild and domestic canines
What is the common name for Canis lupus dingo?
The common name for Canis lupus dingo is Dingo. Some consider it a subspecies of the wolf, while others regard it as a distinct species.
What dog is close to a dingo?
The Carolina dog resembles the Australian Dingo in appearance, but is classified as Canis familiaris. If you're curious about the similarities and differences, learn more about these unique canine breeds.
Featured Images: pexels.com