Understanding Canis Lupus Dingo Origins and Evolution

Author

Posted Nov 1, 2024

Reads 1.3K

Cute Dog Standing behind Fence
Credit: pexels.com, Cute Dog Standing behind Fence

The Canis Lupus Dingo is a fascinating creature with a rich history. It's believed to have originated from a domesticated dog that was introduced to Australia by Asian sailors around 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

The exact timing of the Dingo's arrival in Australia is still debated among scientists. However, most agree that the Dingo's ancestors were likely brought to the continent by humans.

As the Dingo adapted to its new environment, it began to change and evolve into the unique species we see today. This process of adaptation was likely influenced by the Dingo's diet and the geographic isolation of the Australian continent.

Taxonomy and Classification

Taxonomy and Classification is a complex and debated topic among zoologists. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) advises on the correct use of scientific names of animals.

The ICZN has entered Canis familiaris and Canis dingo into its official list, making them available for use as correct names for the taxa in question. According to the Principle of Coordination, the same epithets can also be applied at subspecies level.

Credit: youtube.com, Subspecies of Canis lupus

In 2005, W. Christopher Wozencraft listed the dingo as a subspecies of Canis lupus, but this classification is debated among zoologists. Some argue that the dingo should be considered a distinct taxon, Canis dingo Meyer 1793, due to its distinct behavior, morphology, and genetic characteristics.

Here is a list of taxonomic synonyms for Canis lupus dingo:

  • Canis dingo Meyer, 1793: 33 (protonym) [available name, validated by ICZN, Opinion 451, 1957]
  • Canis familiaris dingo: Blumenbach, 1799 [changed rank]
  • Canis lupus dingo: Wilson & Reeder, Mammal Species of the World (3rd edition), 1995: 576 (and possibly earlier sources) [subspecies allocated to different parent]

Taxonavigation

Taxonavigation is the process of classifying living organisms into a hierarchy of ranks. This is done by assigning a specific taxonomic rank to each species, such as kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. The taxonavigation of the dingo, Canis lupus dingo, starts at the highest rank, Eukaryota, and works its way down to the species level.

The dingo belongs to the kingdom Animalia, and more specifically, to the phylum Chordata, which includes animals with a notochord, a dorsal nerve cord, and a post-anal tail. The dingo's taxonavigation also includes the class Mammalia, order Carnivora, family Canidae, and genus Canis.

Here is a breakdown of the dingo's taxonavigation:

  • Superregnum: Eukaryota
  • Regnum: Animalia
  • Subregnum: Eumetazoa
  • Phylum: Chordata
  • Subphylum: Vertebrata
  • Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
  • Megaclassis: Osteichthyes
  • Classis: Mammalia
  • Subclassis: Trechnotheria
  • Infraclassis: Zatheria
  • Supercohors: Theria
  • Cohors: Eutheria
  • Infraclassis: Placentalia
  • Superordo: Laurasiatheria
  • Grandordo: Ferungulata
  • Mirordo: Ferae
  • Cladus: Pancarnivora
  • Cladus: Carnivoramorpha
  • Cladus: Carnivoraformes
  • Ordo: Carnivora
  • Subordo: Caniformia
  • Familia: Canidae
  • Subfamilia: Caninae
  • Tribus: Canini
  • Genus: Canis
  • Species: Canis lupus
  • Subspecies: Canis lupus dingo

Combinations

Credit: youtube.com, Classification

Taxonomy and Classification can get pretty complex, but let's break it down. The classification of Canis dingo, a type of wild dog, has undergone significant changes over the years.

The first recorded name for Canis dingo was Canis dingo Meyer, 1793, which was later validated by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN).

The name Canis familiaris dingo was proposed by Blumenbach in 1799, but it was a change in rank rather than a new species.

In 1995, Wilson and Reeder allocated Canis dingo as a subspecies of Canis lupus in their book Mammal Species of the World (3rd edition), page 576.

Here are the different combinations of names used to classify Canis dingo:

  • Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
  • Canis familiaris dingo Blumenbach, 1799
  • Canis lupus dingo Wilson & Reeder, 1995

Taxonomic Debate

Taxonomic debate is a lively topic among zoologists, and it's fascinating to explore the different perspectives on the classification of the dingo. Mathew Crowther, Stephen Jackson, and Colin Groves disagree with Wozencraft's classification, arguing that the dingo should be considered a distinct taxon, Canis dingo Meyer 1793.

Credit: youtube.com, Taxonomy: Life's Filing System - Crash Course Biology #19

The ICZN Opinion 2027 plays a significant role in this debate, as it states that a domestic animal cannot be a subspecies. Crowther and others argue that the dingo's differences in behavior, morphology, and genetics justify its classification as a distinct taxon. They point out that the dingo and dog do not fall within the same clade as the wolf.

The taxonomic synonyms for the dingo are numerous, with some considering it a subspecies of the wolf, Canis lupus, while others regard it as a distinct species or subspecies of the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. The list of synonyms is quite extensive:

  • Canis antarticus (sic) Kerr, 1792 [suppressed by ICZN, Opinion 451, 1957]
  • Canis australiae Gray, 1826
  • Canis dingoides Matschie, 1915
  • Canis macdonnellensis Matschie, 1915
  • Canis papuensis Ramsay, 1879
  • Canis tenggerana Kohlbrugge, 1896
  • Canis hallstromi Troughton, 1957
  • Canis familiaris australasiae Desmarest, 1820
  • Canis familiaris novaehollandiae Voigt, 1831
  • Canis tanggerana harappensis Prashad, 1936

The ICZN has entered the names Canis familiaris and Canis dingo into its official list, making them available for use as correct names for the taxa in question. However, taxonomists continue to debate the classification of the dingo, with some considering it a subspecies of the wolf and others regarding it as a distinct species or subspecies of the domestic dog.

Lineage

Credit: youtube.com, Taxonomy | Classification of Living Organisms

The lineage of the dingo is a fascinating topic. Dingoes are descended from a small founding population that arrived in Australia between 12,000 and 3,500 years ago.

Studies of mtDNA indicate that dingoes are descended from a single founding event or no more than a few founding events, with estimates ranging from 5,400–4,600 years ago to 18,300–4,640 years ago.

The dingo's lineage is closely tied to that of domestic dogs, with whole genome sequencing indicating that there was ancient inbreeding in the founding population that first arrived in Australia less than 4,000 years ago.

Genetic evidence suggests that dingoes cluster with the same clade as about 71% of dog breeds and wolves do, indicating a close relationship between the two.

Here are some key dates in the dingo's lineage:

  • 12,000-3,500 years ago: Dingoes arrive in Australia
  • 5,400-4,600 years ago: Dingoes undergo a single founding event or no more than a few founding events
  • 4,000 years ago: Ancient inbreeding occurs in the founding population

The dingo's unique genetic makeup is a result of its isolation from other dogs until the arrival of Europeans, making it a fascinating subject for study in the field of taxonomy and classification.

Genetic Evidence

Credit: youtube.com, Desert Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) Genome Provides Insights into Their Role in Australian Ecosystems

The genetic evidence suggests that dingoes share a common ancestry with domestic dogs and wolves. This is supported by the sequencing of ancient dog genomes, which indicates that dingoes descended from an ancient, now-extinct wolf population.

Genetic studies have shown that dingoes cluster with the same clade as 71% of dog breeds and wolves. This is likely due to the fact that a very early or very primitive canid will share wolf-like traits.

Mitochondrial genome sequences indicate that dingoes have very few maternal haplotypes, with only two haplotypes (A29 and A79) being found in a sample of 211 dingoes. These haplotypes differ by only one substitution in the control region, suggesting a single founding event.

However, a more recent study found 20 different maternal haplotypes in a sample of 25 dingoes, suggesting a larger founding population and possibly more than one founding event.

Paternal haplotypes on the Y chromosome in dingoes are few, with only two haplotypes (H3 and H60) being found. These haplotypes are shared with other dog breeds, suggesting that dingoes are feralized descendants of southeast Asian dogs.

Take a look at this: Domestic Dingo Dog

Credit: youtube.com, Are Dingoes Dogs?

Some dog breeds, including the dingo and the Basenji, are almost as genetically divergent from other dogs as the dog is from the wolf. This distinctiveness could be reflecting geographic isolation from the admixture that later occurred in other dogs in their regions.

The dingo's genome contains 2% gene flow from the Tibetan wolf, which likely represents ancient admixture in eastern Eurasia.

Dingo Origins and History

The dingo's origins and history are a fascinating topic. In 1623, Jan Carstenszoon was the first European to sight Australian Aborigines with canids, later followed by William Dampier in 1699.

The name Canis dingo was first proposed by Friedrich Meyer in 1793, ratified by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature in 1957. Meyer's paper was based on a painting of a dingo and a brief description by Governor Arthur Phillip, rather than first-hand observations.

A painting of a dingo, completed in 1772, was commissioned by Joseph Banks and based on his observations during the Cook voyage. The painting was one of several produced by George Stubbs.

Origins

Credit: youtube.com, Origin of the Dingo: Australia's Ancient Canine

The first recorded sighting of Australian Aborigines with canids was in 1623 by Jan Carstenszoon, but it wasn't until 1699 that William Dampier made similar observations.

The name Canis dingo was proposed by Friedrich Meyer in 1793, but it was based on Governor Arthur Phillip's brief description and a painting, rather than first-hand observations of the animal.

In 1768, James Cook led a scientific voyage to New Holland, which is now Australia, and collected specimens for further study.

The first Fleet arrived in Botany Bay in 1788, under the command of Australia's first colonial governor, Arthur Phillip, who took ownership of a dingo and made a brief description with an illustration.

Friedrich Meyer classified the "Dog of New South Wales" as Canis dingo in 1793, based on Phillip's description and illustration.

However, it was discovered in 1947 that Meyer's name had been predated by another taxon, Canis antarticus Kerr, 1792, which had priority over Meyer's name.

The International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) suppressed the epithet antarticus in 1957, in favor of dingo Meyer 1793.

Papua New Guinea

Credit: youtube.com, A Super Quick History of Papua New Guinea

In Papua New Guinea, you can find a unique canine species known as the Papuan dog, which was originally described as Canis familiaris var. papuensis by Ramsay in 1879.

These dogs are smaller than dingos, don't have the characteristic bushy tail, and have relatively smaller brain parts compared to the dingo.

They are often timid and howl rather than bark, a distinct trait that sets them apart from other dogs.

In some villages, Papuan dogs are fed by their owners, but they also have a knack for foraging for food, hunting for crabs and small fish on reefs at low tide.

At night, they help clean up refuse left in the village, often alongside pigs.

Rarely do Papuan dogs go hunting with their owners, but this species has sparked interest in its origins, with some proposing that Canis papuensis may simply refer to feral dogs.

Related reading: Toxocara Canis in Dogs

Dingo Characteristics and Attributes

The dingo is a fascinating creature, and let's start with its name. The taxon Canis dingo, or Canis lupus dingo, or Canis familiaris dingo, or simply included within Canis familiaris without further differentiation, according to different authorities.

For your interest: Domestic Dog Scientific Name

Credit: youtube.com, Dingo || Description, Characteristics and Facts!

The dingo's name has a rich history, and it's interesting to note that it was first classified by Friedrich Meyer in 1793 as Canis dingo, based on Arthur Phillip's brief description and illustration of the "Dog of New South Wales".

The dingo's taxonomic synonyms include Canis familiaris australasiae, Canis australiae, Canis dingoides, Canis macdonnellensis, and Canis familiaris novaehollandiae, which were all regarded as its taxonomic synonyms located in Australia.

James Cook's voyage of discovery to Australia in 1768 marked the beginning of the dingo's history in scientific records. His ship, the HMS Endeavour, arrived in Botany Bay in 1770, and the mission made notes and collected specimens for taking back to Britain.

The dingo's classification has undergone changes over the years, and in 1947, it was discovered that Meyer's taxon Canis dingo had been named already, as the "New Holland dog" Canis antarticus [sic] Kerr, 1792.

Conclusion

The Canis lupus dingo is a unique and fascinating species. They are a distinct population of the grey wolf that has been isolated in Australia for thousands of years.

Credit: youtube.com, australian wild dog facts about canis lupus dingo part 2

Their adaptability to the Australian environment is a testament to their resilience and ability to thrive in harsh conditions. They have been able to survive without a significant reduction in their population.

Their diet consists mainly of small to medium-sized prey, which they hunt in packs. This social behavior allows them to hunt more efficiently and increase their chances of survival.

Their ability to coexist with humans has been a subject of interest, with some dingoes being kept as pets and others living in the wild. However, it's essential to remember that dingoes are wild animals and should be treated with caution and respect.

Their unique genetic makeup has made them an important subject of study in the field of genetics and conservation biology.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a dingo breed with a dog?

Yes, dingos can interbreed with domestic dogs, resulting in hybrids or crossbreds. This process has been occurring since European settlement in Australia.

Is a dingo a wolf or coyote?

Dingos are not wolves or coyotes, but rather an intermediate species between wolves and domestic dogs, according to recent DNA sequencing. Their unique genetic makeup sets them apart from both wild and domestic canines

What is the common name for Canis lupus dingo?

The common name for Canis lupus dingo is Dingo. Some consider it a subspecies of the wolf, while others regard it as a distinct species.

What dog is close to a dingo?

The Carolina dog resembles the Australian Dingo in appearance, but is classified as Canis familiaris. If you're curious about the similarities and differences, learn more about these unique canine breeds.

Sources

  1. 10.11646/zootaxa.4654.1.6 (doi.org)
  2. 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.7 (doi.org)
  3. Full article (PDF) (mapress.com)
  4. 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.2.1 (doi.org)
  5. 10.1111/jzo.12134 (doi.org)
  6. Canis lupus dingo Meyer, 1793 (itis.gov)
  7. Canis lupus dingo (iucnredlist.org)
  8. IUCN: (iucnredlist.org)
  9. Mammal Species of the World. (bucknell.edu)
  10. 10.1002/ece3.3487 (doi.org)
  11. 10.1093/molbev/mst027 (doi.org)
  12. 10.1038/hdy.2015.49 (doi.org)
  13. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1687 (doi.org)
  14. 10.1093/molbev/msp195 (doi.org)
  15. 10.1038/icb.1979.28 (doi.org)
  16. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T41585A10484199.en (doi.org)
  17. 10.1038/s41598-018-28324-x (doi.org)
  18. 10.1093/molbev/msz311 (doi.org)
  19. 10.1080/03122417.2013.11681961 (doi.org)
  20. 10.5962/bhl.part.11886 (doi.org)
  21. "Remark about the Circumvolutions of the Cerebrum of Canis dingo" (biodiversitylibrary.org)
  22. 2015CBio...25.2158K (harvard.edu)
  23. "Canis familiaris" (mammaldiversity.org)
  24. Walker's Mammals of the World (google.com)
  25. "Chapter 18–The warp and weft: Synthesising our taxonomic tapestry" (anu.edu.au)
  26. "A Review of Canid Classification" (amnh.org)
  27. Official Lists and Indexes of Names in Zoology (iczn.org)
  28. "canine" (etymonline.com)
  29. 10.1007/s10709-012-9658-5 (doi.org)
  30. 10.1098/rspb.2011.1395 (doi.org)
  31. 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.2.1 (doi.org)
  32. Taxonomy of Australian Mammals (google.com)
  33. The Dingo Debate: Origins, Behaviour and Conservation (google.com)
  34. Managing the impacts of dingoes and other wild dogs (researchgate.net)
  35. DOI (doi.org)
  36. DOI (doi.org)
  37. Google Scholar (google.com)
  38. DOI (doi.org)
  39. DOI (doi.org)
  40. Google Scholar (google.com)
  41. DOI (doi.org)
  42. Google Scholar (google.com)
  43. DOI (doi.org)
  44. Google Scholar (google.com)
  45. DOI (doi.org)
  46. Google Scholar (google.com)
  47. DOI (doi.org)
  48. Google Scholar (google.com)
  49. Google Scholar (google.com)
  50. DOI (doi.org)
  51. DOI (doi.org)
  52. Google Scholar (google.com)
  53. Google Scholar (google.com)
  54. Google Scholar (google.com)
  55. Google Scholar (google.com)
  56. Google Scholar (google.com)
  57. Google Scholar (google.com)
  58. Google Scholar (google.com)
  59. Google Scholar (google.com)
  60. Google Scholar (google.com)
  61. Google Scholar (google.com)
  62. DOI (doi.org)
  63. Google Scholar (google.com)
  64. Google Scholar (google.com)
  65. DOI (doi.org)
  66. DOI (doi.org)
  67. DOI (doi.org)
  68. Google Scholar (google.com)
  69. Google Scholar (google.com)
  70. Top-down effects of a large mammalian carnivore in arid Australia extend to epigeic arthropod assemblages. (researchgate.net)
  71. Continental patterns in the diet of a top predator: Australia’s dingo. (wiley.com)
  72. Australian Wildlife Conservancy (australianwildlife.org)
  73. Dingo Sanctuary Bargo (dingosanctuarybargo.com.au)
  74. DINGO DEN ANIMAL RESCUE – Dingo Conservation (dingoden.net)
  75. Australian Dingo Foundation (dingofoundation.org)
  76. The Dingo for Biodiversity Project (dingobiodiversity.com)
  77. Old dogs, new tricks: 3D geometric analysis of cranial morphology supports ancient population substructure in the Australian dingo. (springer.com)
  78. The Dogma of Dingoes—Taxonomic status of the dingo: A reply to Smith et al. (mapress.com)
  79. Responses of dingo (Canis familiaris) populations to landscape-scale baiting (sciencedirect.com)
  80. Taxonomy of the Dingo: It’s an ancient dog (allenpress.com)
  81. Phenotypic variation and promiscuity in a wild population of pure dingoes (Canis dingo). (wiley.com)
  82. There is no Dingo dilemma: legislation facilitates culling, containment and conservation of Dingoes in New South Wales. (rzsnsw.org.au)
  83. Introgression does not influence the positive ecological and functional role of dingo populations (rzsnsw.org.au)
  84. A historical review of Australian aerial vertebrate pest control, targeting dingoes and wild dogs 1946-2019. (rzsnsw.org.au)
  85. Geographic hot spots of dingo genetic ancestry in southeastern Australia despite hybridisation with domestic dogs. (springer.com)
  86. The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?. (biomedcentral.com)
  87. The dingo menace’: an historic survey on graziers’ management of an Australian carnivore. (semanticscholar.org)
  88. Attitudes towards dingoes (Canis dingo) and their management: a case study from a mining operation in the Great Sandy Desert, Western Australia (csiro.au)
  89. Pets and pests: a review of the contrasting economics and fortunes of dingoes and domestic dogs in Australia, and a proposed new funding scheme for non-lethal dingo management. (csiro.au)
  90. A scoping review of dingo and wild-living dog ecology and biology in Australia to inform parameterisation for disease spread modelling (frontiersin.org)
  91. Reconstructing body mass of the Australian dingo (Canis dingo) from two simple measurements of the hard palate. (sciencedirect.com)
  92. Diurnal pattern of preweaning den visits and nursing in breeding pairs of captive dingoes (Canis dingo). (researchgate.net)
  93. Dingo baiting did not reduce fetal/calf loss in beef cattle in northern South Australia. (csiro.au)
  94. [PDF] A roadmap to meaningful dingo conservation (researchgate.net)
  95. Dingo baiting did not reduce fetal/calf loss in beef cattle in northern South Australia (csiro.au)
  96. [HTML] Prey use by dingoes in a contested landscape: Ecosystem service provider or biodiversity threat? (wiley.com)
  97. Recreational fishing alters dingo foraging behavior on Fraser Island (wiley.com)
  98. Human–dingo interactions on Fraser Island: an analysis of serious incident reports; (csiro.au)
  99. Do female dingo–dog hybrids breed like dingoes or dogs?; (csiro.au)
  100. Canis lupus dingo Meyer, 1793 (bucknell.edu)
  101. Mammal Species of the World (v3, 2005) link (bucknell.edu)
  102. Canis lupus dingo Meyer, 1793 (itis.gov)
  103. Edit infobox data on Wikidata (wikidata.org)
  104. Canis_lupus_dingo (animaldiversity.org)
  105. 122322 (inaturalist.org)
  106. 6164184 (gbif.org)
  107. 1267720 (eol.org)
  108. 183815 (itis.gov)

Jenny Koss

Writer

Jenny Koss is a seasoned writer with a passion for storytelling and a knack for uncovering unique tales. Her writing career has taken her from the rolling hills of the countryside to the bustling streets of the city, where she's covered a wide range of topics with curiosity and enthusiasm. With a keen eye for detail and a love of adventure, Jenny has tackled subjects as varied as truffle hunting, where she immersed herself in the ancient art of foraging for the world's most prized fungi.