Shock Collars and Dogs: A Comprehensive Guide

Shock collars can be an effective tool in training dogs, but they should be used with caution and in conjunction with positive reinforcement techniques.

In fact, studies have shown that shock collars can be up to 90% effective in stopping undesirable behaviors in dogs, but this effectiveness comes with a risk of causing long-term psychological damage if misused.

Dogs can sense the shock of a collar from up to 10 feet away, which is why it's essential to introduce the collar gradually and in a controlled environment.

The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior recommends against the use of shock collars, citing the potential for causing fear, anxiety, and aggression in dogs.

Shock collars work by sending electrical currents through metal contact points on the collar, giving a dog an electric shock.

The level of shock is typically controlled by the owner, which can range from a mild, tickling sensation to a painful shock.

Shock collars have been used as training collars but are increasingly being removed from shelves.

Using shock collars can cause fear and, in some cases, aggressive behavior in dogs.

An inexperienced dog owner may use the shock feature if the dog digs a hole in the yard, even when the dog wasn’t caught in the act.

This misuse of shock collars is not only inhumane but also ineffective because the dog will have no clue as to why they’re suddenly riddled with pain and fear.

Shock collars work by delivering a brief, controlled electrical stimulus to a dog's neck when they exhibit undesired behavior, such as barking or pulling on the leash.

This stimulus is typically generated by a small battery-powered device that sends a signal to a collar worn by the dog, which then delivers the shock through metal contacts.

The intensity of the shock can be adjusted to suit the dog's sensitivity and the desired response, with some collars offering multiple levels of correction.

A fresh viewpoint: Should I Take My Dog's Collar off at Night?

Some people try to soften the image of shock collars by calling them "e-collars" or "training collars". They do this to avoid the fact that shock collars actually shock.

The term "e-collars" is a euphemism used by some supporters of shock collars to downplay their true nature.

Dogs trained with shock collars often work slowly and deliberately to avoid being shocked.

This behavior is a result of stress and overthinking, as seen in scientific studies where dogs displayed stress signals when approaching the training area.

The punishment of the collar outweighs the joy of the sport, leading to a lack of enthusiasm and speed in their work.

Highly skilled shock collar trainers can force a dog to work quickly by using negative reinforcement, where the dog's behavior makes a bad thing go away, increasing the desired behavior.

But this approach doesn't create a happy attitude towards training, unlike positive reinforcement methods that make training a joyful experience.

Readers also liked: Dog Training Positive Reinforcement

Shock collars can cause physical harm, but it's not from the electricity reaching the ground, it's from the pain caused by electricity passing through the dog's body via closely-spaced electrodes.

This pain is described as physiological, meaning it's not associated with any tissue damage, and is therefore psychological rather than physical.

Burns from shock collars are not unheard of, and in fact, the US Center for Veterinary Medicine found severe burns in the collar area and possible personality adjustment injuries to dogs in one case.

The lack of regulation or standards on shock collars means that the safety and operational characteristics of individual products cannot be verified.

No studies have shown that shock collars are more effective than positive reinforcement training.

Training Effectiveness is a crucial aspect to consider when deciding on a training method for your furry friend. No studies have shown that shock collars are more effective than positive reinforcement training.

Shock collars have been widely discredited as a reliable training method. Positive reinforcement training, on the other hand, has been proven to be a more humane and effective way to train animals.

Readers also liked: The Power of Positive Dog Training

Pain from shock collars is not caused by physical damage, but rather physiological pain due to electricity passing through the dog's body via closely-spaced electrodes.

Burns from shock collars are not unheard of, and in 1980, the US Center for Veterinary Medicine found severe burns in the collar area and possible personality adjustment injuries to dogs.

The US FDA's standing policy is that dog collars which are activated by the noise of barking to produce an electric shock are considered hazardous to the animal's health.

There is considerable variation in shock level, pulse duration, and repetition rate between manufacturers, and perhaps even between batches of collars from a single manufacturer, due to the lack of regulation or standards.

The safety and operational characteristics of individual products cannot be verified due to the lack of regulation or standards, and the fact that some of the safety features of shock collars are patented by specific manufacturers.

Some researchers, like Dr. Diane Frank, believe that shock collars inflict substantial pain and distress, regardless of the level of amperage.

Dr. Frank argues that even low levels of amperage can cause pain and stress in dogs.

She notes that the perception of pain can vary from dog to dog, but the stress response can still interfere with learning.

In contrast, Dr. Dieter Klein suggests that modern devices with low current remote stimulation cause minimal pain.

He compares the impact of shock collars to other devices using electrical stimulation in human medicine, where organic damage is unlikely.

Steven R. Lindsay notes that at low levels, the effect of electronic training collars is more like a "pulsing tingling or tickling sensation" on the skin's surface.

However, he also warns that higher levels can cause "fear" and "acute pain".

Intriguing read: Static Stimulation Dog Collar

Shock collars are effective in stopping behavior, but they come with unwanted side effects known as fallout. This occurs when the pain associated with the shock is linked to the trainer, training process, and environment, causing stress for the animal.

The pain caused by shock collars is difficult to measure, but researchers agree that it's a real and significant issue. Dr. Diane Frank argues that shock collars inflict substantial pain and distress on dogs.

At low levels, the pain from shock collars may be perceived as a tingling or tickling sensation, but this can still cause significant stress and fear. In contrast, higher levels of shock can cause acute pain and even lead to long-term potentiation, a molecular change associated with hippocampal memory.

The use of shock collars can also lead to learned helplessness, a state where the dog gives up and fails to respond to their environment. This is a common issue in rescue dogs that have been subjected to abusive training methods.

Pain from shock collars is not associated with tissue damage, but rather with physiological pain caused by electricity passing through the dog's body. While burns are unlikely to occur, they can happen in rare cases, especially if the device is malfunctioning or poorly designed.

Consider reading: How to Stop Staffy Pulling on Lead

Schilder and van der Borg's 2004 study found that police service dogs trained with shock collars exhibited more stress-related behaviors and a lower body posture than those not trained with shock collars.

The study suggests that shock collars can have a long-term effect on stress-related behavior, even in the absence of shock.

Christiansen et al.'s 2001 study found that dogs previously trained with shock collars showed a significant increase in latency to approach a person during a path test, even though this was not a condition under which shocks had been delivered.

However, the study also found that dogs that had shown interest in sheep in the first year showed a persistent interest in year two, and no dogs chased or attacked sheep as their first response.

Schalke et al.'s 2007 study found that dogs who could clearly associate the shock with their action did not show considerable or persistent stress, but the study had several flaws, including the second group of dogs being trained without a prey dummy but tested with it.

For another approach, see: Crate Training Night 1

The study's results suggest that poor timing and/or inappropriate use of a shock collar puts the dog at high risk of severe and ongoing stress.

Steiss et al.'s 2007 study found that bark control collars effectively deterred barking without statistically significant elevations in plasma cortisol, but the study had a significant flaw in that the lack of statistical significance was probably due to the small sample sizes.

A meta-review of 17 peer-reviewed studies by Ziv in 2017 found that using aversive training methods, including shock collars, can jeopardize both the physical and mental health of dogs.

The meta-review singled out shock collars by referring to the conclusion of Overall (2007) that they "should not be used for behavior modification in dogs, because of their aversive nature and due to the lack of scientific data on their effectiveness".

Shock collars can too easily lead to abuse, and many people don't want to hurt their dogs, so they set the shock at a low setting which is typically ineffective for stopping the undesired behavior.

Some people feel powerful when punishing a dog, and when given a shock collar, it can lead to a vicious cycle of abuse. Many professional trainers have seen dogs "house-trained" with shock collars, but this is not a useful concept when you want to house-train a dog.

The damage caused by shock collars can be extensive, as seen in the case of a terrier that was rehabilitated by a professional trainer after months of work.

Recommended read: How to Housetrain an Older Dog

Shock collars can be ineffective at stopping undesired behavior, as people often set the shock at a low setting and gradually increase it, leading to a loss of the surprise effect.

Many people who use shock collars may feel powerful punishing their dogs, which can lead to a vicious cycle of abuse. This is a serious concern that trainers and dog owners should be aware of.

Some trainers have seen dogs learn to avoid certain behaviors, but not in a useful way, such as a terrier learning to avoid urinating in front of humans rather than in the house. This can make house-training more difficult.

Professional trainers have had to work months to undo the damage caused by shock collars, and in some cases, it's not possible to fully recover from the negative effects.

Additional reading: E Collar Dog Trainers

In many parts of the world, shock collars are considered inhumane and are banned. Germany, for example, has outlawed their use.

Some countries have completely banned shock collars, including France and Spain. The Netherlands, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Wales have also joined the list.

The Canadian province of Quebec and Slovenia are also shock collar-free zones. Australia has banned them in some regions, including New South Wales, South Australia, and the Australian Capital Territory.

Switzerland has taken a step further by banning automatic anti-barking shock collars. Flanders in Belgium will follow suit after 2027.

Here's a list of countries and regions where shock collars are banned:

Legal cases involving shock collars have been a significant concern. In 2001, British magistrates found that shock collars were responsible for aggressive behaviors in three dogs.

The initial incident occurred when the dogs, startled by a small dog, caused their owner to jump, inadvertently triggering the shock collars. This led to the dogs associating small dogs with receiving shocks, resulting in fear and aggression towards them. Over time, this escalated, leading to the dogs attacking and killing a small dog.

Check this out: Small Dog Bark Collar

In 2002, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) in Victoria, Australia lost a defamation lawsuit to a shock collar manufacturer. They were ordered to pay AUD100,000 in damages.

The RSPCA was found to have falsely claimed that shock collars can cause burns, deliver 3,000 volt shocks to dogs, and that the current from a shock collar had caused a 60 kilogram dog to perform backflips and result in brain damage.

A ban on the use of shock collars for cats and dogs was upheld in 2010 by the High Court in Wales. The court ruled that it did not breach Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights.

In 2011, a Welsh man became the first person convicted of illegal use of a shock collar in Wales, receiving a fine of £2,000.

Consider reading: How to Put a Shock Collar on a Dog