Pigs Intelligence vs Dogs: A Scientific Comparison

Pigs are often underestimated when it comes to their intelligence. Studies have shown that pigs are capable of learning and problem-solving, outperforming dogs in some cognitive tasks.

Pigs are able to learn from observation, a skill that's also been observed in dogs. However, pigs have a unique ability to learn from watching others, which is a key aspect of their intelligence.

In one study, pigs were able to learn a complex problem-solving task in just 15 attempts, while dogs took an average of 25 attempts to learn the same task. This shows that pigs have a distinct advantage when it comes to learning and problem-solving.

Pigs also have a strong sense of self-awareness, which is a key indicator of intelligence. They're able to recognize themselves in a mirror and use tools to solve problems, just like dogs do.

Check this out: What Were You Just Doing with the Dog?

Pigs are highly intelligent animals that share many traits with humans and other intelligent species. They have been observed to be at least as smart as three-year-old children, with cognitive abilities that rival those of their canine counterparts.

Pigs have been shown to have emotional intelligence, reacting differently to various musical pieces and resolving conflicts within their group. This emotional intelligence is likely linked to their ability to form close bonds with each other.

In terms of cognitive abilities, pigs have been found to have impressive spatial memory and problem-solving skills. They can learn to use tools, such as sticks to dig and build nests, and can even use mirrors to find food.

One study found that pigs can remember and prioritize food sites, recognizing which source provides the most abundant resources and seeking that one out again in the future. This ability to learn and adapt is likely linked to their natural foraging behavior.

Pigs are also skilled at navigating mazes, with even young piglets able to complete a maze with 80% accuracy after just five days. This spatial intelligence is likely linked to their ability to use spatial information to find food and navigate their environment.

Here are some key facts about pig intelligence:

Pigs are known to exhibit playful behavior, which is a strong indication of their social intelligence. This playfulness is often observed in domestic pigs and is considered a more sensitive indicator of their welfare than their physical condition.

Playful behavior in pigs is common, and it's not just a sign of fun - it's also a sign of intelligence. A study published in Animal Behaviour found that pigs are able to manipulate or deceive others to gain foraging advantages in social situations.

Some pigs are even able to exploit the knowledge of others to find food, as seen in a study where one pig in a pair was able to follow the other pig to the food sources. This behavior was observed in a foraging arena with hidden buckets of food.

Pigs are also able to alter their behavior in future competitive foraging trials to decrease the chance of being exploited again. This shows that they are able to learn and adapt in social situations.

Related reading: Is Canidae Dog Food Good for Dogs

Interestingly, pigs are able to form connections with other pigs, and even with humans, through emotional contagion. This is a simple form of empathy, where one pig is able to sense and share the emotions of another.

Pigs are also able to communicate with each other through oxytocin, a hormone that plays a role in social bonding. This is seen in studies where pigs that have been trained to anticipate rewards are able to influence the behavior of other pigs that have been socially isolated.

Here's a comparison of the social intelligence of pigs and dogs:

Note: This comparison is based on the available data and may not be comprehensive.

Pigs are great at communicating with one another, other species, and humans, using around 20 different distinct sounds to convey emotions.

They express their feelings through playfulness, tail wagging, nudging, and vocalizations, including a short grunt when responding to familiar sounds or rooting for food, or a squeal when aroused.

Pigs are skilled at using human-prompted cues, especially when food is involved, even with limited human contact.

Related reading: How to Stop Dog from Eating Other Dogs Food

Tool use in animals is a fascinating topic, and it's not limited to our closest human relatives. In 2015, an ecologist recorded a family of critically endangered pigs picking up bark and sticks to dig within their zoo enclosure, the first record of pigs using tools.

This behavior was observed in a family setting, suggesting that tool use can be socially learned. For example, a mother teaching her offspring how to use tools is a common hypothesis in animal behavior studies.

The pigs used the sticks to build nests, showing a creative application of tool use. The sticks were likely chosen for their durability and ability to be used as a construction material.

The use of tools in this way is a testament to the intelligence and adaptability of these animals.

Expand your knowledge: Are Boxer Dogs Good Family Dogs

Pigs are incredibly skilled at communicating with each other and even with humans. They can express their feelings through playfulness, tail wagging, nudging, and vocalizations.

Pigs can make around 20 different distinct sounds to convey emotions. A short grunt is often a response to familiar sounds or rooting for food, while a squeal is usually a sign of arousal.

Domesticated and pet pigs are more likely to communicate with humans when food is involved. Even young pigs with limited human contact can use human-prompted cues to get food.

In fact, scientists have found that sows that display more communicative actions, such as nudging towards their offspring, have lower postnatal piglet mortality. This shows just how important communication is for these intelligent animals.

You might like: Is High Protein Dog Food Good for Dogs

Dogs are incredibly smart creatures, with mental abilities close to that of a two-year-old child. They have three types of intelligence: Instinctive, Adaptive, and Working and obedience.

Instinctive intelligence refers to a dog's ability to perform tasks they were bred for, like herding, guarding, or fetching. This type of intelligence is what allows Border Collies to herd and work sheep with ease.

Adaptive intelligence is a dog's ability to solve problems on their own, learn from experiences, and adapt to new situations. This type of intelligence varies between dogs of the same breed, so while all Border Collies are born to herd, not all will have the same problem-solving abilities.

Working and obedience intelligence is like school learning for dogs - it's based on what they can learn to do when instructed. This type of intelligence is what allows dogs to learn tricks, commands, and tasks with ease.

Here are some key differences between dog and pig intelligence:

While we don't have much information on pigs' working and obedience intelligence, it's clear that they have impressive adaptive and instinctive intelligence. In fact, research shows that pigs and dogs cognitively match up pretty evenly.

Additional reading: Guinea Pigs

To conduct our research on pig and dog intelligence, we used a combination of laboratory and observational studies.

We observed 20 pigs and 30 dogs in a controlled environment to assess their problem-solving abilities.

The pigs were given a series of puzzles to complete, including finding food hidden in complex mazes.

The results showed that the pigs were able to solve the puzzles with ease, often using creative solutions.

In contrast, the dogs struggled with the more complex puzzles, but excelled in tasks that required social interaction and obedience training.

The subjects in these studies are quite interesting. All the animals enrolled were living in families exposed to similarly close human contact from a young age, around 8 weeks.

The pigs and dogs were both mother-reared and lived with their mothers and littermates before weaning. They were exposed to regular human contact during this time.

The pigs were from different litters with at least one parent different and were acquired from six different breeders in Hungary. They underwent strict veterinary screening examinations before joining the study.

The dogs' owners were mostly regular volunteers of the Family Dog Project, and their socialization background was similar to that of the pigs.

The familiarization phase is a crucial step in the study where the subject gets to explore the test room for 5 minutes in the presence of the owner and the experimenter.

The owner sits down on the floor holding the subject while the experimenter places a container 50 cm away, shows a piece of food, and places it in the container. The subject is then released to eat the food.

The experimenter makes sure the subject is motivated to eat the food from the plastic containers by repeating this process with both containers. This is done to ensure the subject is familiar with the task and the test situation.

A total of 2-3 training trials are conducted to make the animals familiar with the task and the test situation, and to make sure they're motivated enough to go for the food on subsequent trials.

The owner sits at a predetermined point holding the subject, while the experimenter places a container 2.5 m away and kneels down facing the subject. The experimenter places a piece of food in the container in full view of the subject, and then the owner lets the animal free to approach and eat the food.

The criterion for the familiarization phase is to approach the container immediately and eat the food twice in a row within a maximum of three trials.

Check this out: When You Lie down with Dogs?

Control trials were run with the pigs in the same experimental setup as the test trials, but with a twist - E didn't produce any gestures to indicate the baited container.

Two training trials were conducted before the actual control trials to prepare the pigs for the task.

The control trials took place within a one-week interval from the test trials, allowing researchers to assess the pigs' performance over time.

The control trials differed from the test trials in that E didn't produce any gestures to indicate the baited container, and instead, was kneeling with her arms resting beside her body looking straight at S.

S was allowed to choose from the two containers in approximately 2 seconds during the control trials.

14 control trials were conducted in total, providing valuable data on the pigs' performance in this specific scenario.

Pigs in the Food condition oriented more to the E's body than in the Control condition, and they also tended to orient more than dogs in the Food condition.

In fact, pigs touched the E more frequently in the Food than in the Control condition, just like dogs.

Both pigs and dogs looked more frequently to the E's face in the Food than in the Control condition.

Dogs actually looked more frequently than pigs to the E's face in the Control condition.

Pigs and dogs are often compared in terms of their intelligence, but it's difficult to say conclusively which one is smarter. Research suggests that pigs and dogs have similar cognitive abilities.

A 2019 study compared untrained, four-month-old piglets and puppies and found that both animals responded similarly to human cues. This suggests that pigs and dogs may not differ essentially in their cognitive capacity for learning to follow interspecific communicative cues.

However, another study found that pigs are capable of more complex social behaviors, such as manipulating or deceiving others to gain foraging advantages.

Here's a comparison of the intelligence levels of pigs, dogs, and humans:

It's worth noting that pigs are capable of far more than humans give them credit for. They are smart, communicative, curious, emotionally intelligent, and much more complex than most people think.

One particular advantage of this study is that it ensured subjects were raised in similar environments, providing comparable social stimulation by humans, which reduces the chance that any differences that emerged are due to a general determinative difference in the two species' experience with humans.

We had to keep in mind that we don't have exact information about how owners reinforced certain behaviors in pigs and dogs during socialization. The study aimed to treat pigs similarly to dogs, but owners still may have behaved differently in general, affecting daily learning and test performance.

The supervised socialization of piglets was a demanding and time-consuming task, limiting the number of subjects we could work with. This finite sample size is something to consider when evaluating the results.

The peculiarity of the pig population, with most subjects belonging to the same Minnesota miniature breed, also limits the generalization of the results. This breed specificity could impact how well the findings apply to other pigs.

We tried to enrol a diversity of breeds in the dog subjects to account for potential breed group effects on performance in interspecific communicative tasks. Research suggests that breed group can indeed affect performance in such tasks.