In Washington State, Cane Corsos are considered a type of dog that requires special attention. They are a large and powerful breed, and as such, are subject to certain laws and regulations.
The Washington State Department of Agriculture regulates the ownership of certain dog breeds, including the Cane Corso. According to the regulations, the Cane Corso is considered a "potentially hazardous" breed due to its size and strength.
To own a Cane Corso in Washington State, you'll need to obtain a permit from the local authorities. This permit requires a background check and proof of liability insurance.
The purpose of these regulations is to ensure public safety and prevent potential harm caused by the dog.
You might like: Bernese Mountain Dog Breeders Washington State
Breed-Specific Laws in Washington State
Breed-specific laws in Washington State are relatively rare, but they do exist. According to Example 3, some cities and counties in Washington State have enacted ordinances prohibiting or regulating the ownership of Cane Corsos, a breed often targeted by breed-specific legislation.
You might enjoy: Shetland Sheepdog Breeders Wa
While there isn't a statewide ban on Cane Corsos in Washington State, it's essential to check local ordinances and restrictions on Cane Corso ownership. If you live in Washington State and are considering owning a Cane Corso, be sure to research the specific laws in your area.
The regulation of wolf-dog hybrids often occurs on a state-level, and in Washington State, this can be a factor in breed-specific laws. Example 2 mentions that state preemption anti-BSL laws bar local governments from regulating specific dog breeds, but Washington State is not among the 22 states that have adopted one.
Here are some states that have enacted state preemption anti-BSL laws, but not Washington State:
- Colorado can supersede the preemption law under home rule authority, but this varies among states.
- California has a mixed preemption state, allowing for the regulation of specific breeds via spay, neuter status, but prohibiting specific breeds to be declared "potentially dangerous" or "vicious".
It's also worth noting that Big industry interests, such as the tobacco industry, have historically pursued state preemption laws to impede local laws. This strategy has been successful in other areas, but it's unclear how it would apply to breed-specific legislation in Washington State.
Take a look at this: Texas Laws on Pit Bulls
State Laws and Preemption
State laws and preemption play a crucial role in determining whether a specific breed of dog, including the Cane Corso, is banned or restricted in a particular area.
Breed-specific legislation (BSL) is a set of laws that target specific breeds of dogs, typically those perceived to be more dangerous or aggressive than others. These laws can range from restrictions on ownership to outright bans.
Some states have enacted state preemption anti-BSL laws, which bar local governments from regulating specific dog breeds. Currently, 22 states have adopted one of these laws, with Wave II beginning in 2012 and ongoing today.
Jurisdictions in Colorado can supersede the preemption law under home rule authority, but home rule authority varies among states.
California is a mixed preemption state, allowing for the regulation of specific breeds via spay, neuter status, but prohibiting specific breeds to be declared "potentially dangerous" or "vicious."
If you live in Washington state, it's essential to check local ordinances and restrictions on Cane Corso ownership, as some cities and counties have enacted ordinances prohibiting or regulating their ownership.
Here are the states where some cities and counties have enacted ordinances prohibiting or regulating Cane Corso ownership:
- Kansas
- Arkansas
- Idaho
- Colorado
- Nebraska
- South Dakota
- Washington
- Oregon
Court Decisions and Legislation
Cane Corsos have been the subject of several court decisions and legislation over the years.
One notable case is American Canine Foundation v. City of Aurora, a 2009 U.S. District Court case in Colorado, which dealt with breed-specific legislation.
Breed-specific legislation (BSL) targets specific breeds of dogs, often those perceived as more aggressive.
Some cities and counties have enacted ordinances prohibiting or regulating Cane Corso ownership, such as in Kansas, Arkansas, Idaho, Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota, Washington, and Oregon.
These states have local restrictions on Cane Corso ownership, so it's essential to check local ordinances.
Here are some notable court decisions related to BSL:
- Venero v. Prince George’s County (United States District Court, Maryland, 2024)
- Danker v. City of Council Bluffs, Iowa (U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit, 2022)
- Buchda v. Village of Fall River (U.S. District Court WD Wisconsin, 2016)
- American Canine Foundation v. City of Aurora (U.S. District Court Colorado, 2009)
- CHAKO vs. City San Francisco (U.S. District Court ND California, 2007)
- Dog Federation v. City of South Milwaukee (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1993)
- Roger Anderson v. City of Des Moines (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1991)
- Holt v. City of Maumelle Arkansas (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1991)
Frequently Asked Questions
What states are cane corsos banned in?
Cane Corsos are banned or restricted in 8 US states: Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington. Check our profile for more information on breed-specific legislation.
Sources
- https://blog.militarybyowner.com/dog-breed-restrictions-for-on-base-military-housing
- https://www.dogsbite.org/legislating-dangerous-dogs-bsl-faq.php
- https://www.dogsbite.org/legislating-dangerous-dogs-bsl-model-laws.php
- https://www.dogster.com/lifestyle/are-cane-corsos-banned-anywhere-in-the-us
- https://www.hepper.com/where-are-cane-corsos-banned-in-the-us/
Featured Images: pexels.com